Process Optimization Routines, Control Responsiveness, and Yield Improvement across Semiconductor Fabrication Lines

Authors

  • Evelyn J. Foster Civil and Urban Engineering Department, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, USA Author

Keywords:

Semiconductor Manufacturing, Process Optimization, Control Responsiveness, Yield Improvement, Advanced Process Control

Abstract

The semiconductor manufacturing industry operates under extreme economic and technical pressures, where marginal improvements in product yield translate directly to substantial financial gains and competitive advantages. This paper provides a comprehensive investigation into the mechanisms through which process optimization routines and control responsiveness drive yield improvement in modern semiconductor fabrication lines. By analyzing the intersection of advanced process control and real-time operational feedback, this study elucidates how modern fabrication facilities mitigate process drift, reduce variability, and enhance overall output quality. The research employs a detailed analytical framework to evaluate the integration of sensor data, metrology feedback, and automated corrective actions. The findings emphasize that while static optimization routines establish a baseline for high-yield manufacturing, it is the dynamic responsiveness of the control systems that prevents systematic defects during continuous operations. Furthermore, the study explores the architectural requirements for low-latency feedback loops, detailing the transition from traditional run-to-run control to instantaneous edge-based corrective mechanisms. The insights derived from this analysis provide a critical understanding of how manufacturing execution systems must evolve to support the next generation of semiconductor devices.

References

1. Wang, X.; Wei, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wang, J.; Yu, H.; Hu, B. A Sinh–Cosh-Enhanced DBO Algorithm Applied to Global Optimization Problems. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 271.

2. Martinez, B.; Valstar, M.F.; Jiang, B.; Pantic, M. Automatic Analysis of Facial Actions: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 2019, 10, 325–347.

3. He, S.; Xie, L.; Liu, J.; Zou, L. Single-use flexible bronchoscopes vs traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes: A prospective con-trolled study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2023, 23, 202.

4. Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21st Century. Sci. Am. 1991, 265, 94–104.

5. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.

6. Picard, R.W. Affective Computing; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997.

7. Heidari, A.A.; Mirjalili, S.A.; Faris, H.; Aljarah, I.; Mafarja, M.; Chen, H. Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 97, 849–872.

8. Abualigah, L.; Diabat, A.; Mirjalili, S.; Abd Elaziz, M.; Gandomi, A.H. The Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2021, 376, 113609.

9. Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, H.; Su, Z.; Wu, J. MIWOA: A multi-strategy improved whale optimization algorithm with hybrid perturbation for engineering optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 2026, 302, 130245.

10. Ouyang, K.; Fu, S.; Chen, Y.; Cai, Q.; Heidari, A.A.; Chen, H. Escape: An optimization method based on crowd evacuation behaviors. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 58, 19.

11. Cambria, E.; White, B. Jumping NLP Curves: A Review of Natural Language Processing Research. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 2014, 9, 48–57.

12. Huang, W.; Chen, W.; Singh, V.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Alabdullatif, M.; Bele, E.; Lye, G.J.; Hailes, H.C.; Tiwari, M.K. Modulation-enabled healable and stretchable shape-memory polymer composites for digital light processing 4D printing. Addit. Manuf. 2025, 101, 104699.

13. Barron, S.; Kennedy, M.P. Can single-use bronchoscopes help prevent nosocomial COVID-19 infections? Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2021, 18, 439–443.

14. Topol, E.J. The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine Is in Your Hands; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2015.

15. Alexandru Joița, F.; Oprea, E.; Magdalena Musuc, A.; Mititelu, M.; Marinescu, F.; Lupuliasa, D.; Lucian, H.; Cosmin Roșca, A.; Boroghina, S.; Andreea Popescu, I. Development of antimicrobial hydogels using alginate-chitosan matrix enhanced with essential oils. Farmacia 2024, 72, 906–916.

16. Reshad, R.A.I.; Jishan, T.A.; Chowdhury, N.N. Chitosan and its broad applications: A brief review. J. Clin. Exp. Investig. 2021, 12, em00779.

17. Poria, S.; Cambria, E.; Bajpai, R.; Hussain, A. A Review of Affective Computing: From Unimodal Analysis to Multimodal Fusion. Inf. Fusion 2017, 37, 98–125.

18. Mouritsen, J.M.; Ehlers, L.; Kovaleva, J.; Ahmad, I.; El-Boghdadly, K. A systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis of reusable vs. single-use flexible bronchoscopes. Anaesthesia 2020, 75, 529–540.

19. Harper, S.; Yesilada, Y. Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research; Springer: London, UK, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

Issue

Section

Articles