Quality Stability under Smart Manufacturing Sensors across Precision Machining Workshops

Authors

  • James Fong Department of Construction and Quality Management, School of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Smart Manufacturing, Finite Element Modeling, Precision Machining, Quality Stability, Sensor Networks

Abstract

The contemporary landscape of smart manufacturing heavily relies on real-time data acquisition to maintain quality stability in precision machining workshops. This paper investigates the integration of smart manufacturing sensors with finite element modeling to establish a robust framework for predicting and assessing quality stability. By simulating complex physical interactions within machining environments, finite element models provide a virtual testbed that validates the efficacy and placement of physical sensors. The research meticulously explores the thermal, mechanical, and vibrational parameters that influence machining precision, utilizing computational models to map these variables against sensor network outputs. Through a comprehensive methodological approach, the study evaluates how strategically deployed sensor networks, guided by finite element analysis, can preemptively identify deviations in quality metrics. The findings suggest that bridging predictive computational models with empirical sensor data significantly enhances the reliability of manufacturing processes, reduces defect rates, and extends tooling lifespans. This alignment between virtual simulations and physical workshop environments represents a critical advancement toward autonomous, self-optimizing manufacturing systems. Ultimately, the paper provides a foundational blueprint for industrial engineers seeking to optimize sensor topologies and elevate quality assurance protocols in highly demanding precision manufacturing sectors.

References

1. Russell, S.; Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed.; Pearson: London, UK, 2021.

2. Alarifi, A.; Al-Salman, A.; Alsaleh, M.; Alnafessah, A.; Al-Hadhrami, S.; Al-Ammar, M.A.; Al-Khalifa, H.S. Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning Technologies: Analysis and Recent Advances. Sensors 2016, 16, 707.

3. Kwan, J.C.; Pillai, S.; Munguia-Lopez, J.G.; Kinsella, J.M.; Tran, S.D. Smart hydrogels for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: How far have we come? Regen. Med. 2025, 20, 585–608.

4. Fitzpatrick, K.K.; Darcy, A.; Vierhile, M. Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults with Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment. Health 2017, 4, e19.

5. Flandes, J.; Giraldo-Cadavid, L.F.; Alfayate, J.; Fernández-Navamuel, I.; Agusti, C.; Lucena, C.M.; Rosell, A.; Andreo, F.; Centeno, C.; Montero, C.; et al. Bronchoscopist’s perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4TM) in selected bronchoscopies: A multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 320.

6. Topol, E. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2019.

7. Panchabhai, T.S.; Mehta, A.C. Historical Perspectives of Bronchoscopy. Connecting the Dots. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, 631–641.

8. Logan, N.; Yurosko, C.; Mehta, A.; Chhabria, M.; Kennedy, M.P. Bronchoscopy-Related Infection and the Development of Single-Use Bronchoscopy Technology. Curr. Pulmonol. Rep. 2023, 12, 190–197.

9. Shneiderman, B. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 495–504.

10. Zheng, Z.; Lin, X.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, Q.; Liu, J.; Chen, M.; Wu, W.; Wu, Z.; Liu, N.; Chen, H. A vascular endothelial growth factor–loaded chitosan-hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffold enhances the therapeutic effect of adipose-derived stem cells in the context of stroke. Neural Regen. Res. 2025, 20, 3591–3605.

11. Su, H.; Zhao, D.; Heidari, A.A.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Mafarja, M.; Chen, H. RIME: A physics-based optimization. Neurocomputing 2023, 532, 183–214.

12. Pan, B.; Hirota, K.; Jia, Z.; Dai, Y. A Review of Multimodal Emotion Recognition from Datasets, Preprocessing, Features, and Fusion Methods. Neurocomputing 2023, 530, 116–138.

13. Mckay, M.D.; Beckman, R.J.; Conover, W.J. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics 1979, 21, 239–245.

14. Maleki, S.; Shamloo, A.; Kalantarnia, F. Tubular TPU/SF nanofibers covered with chitosan-based hydrogels as small-diameter vascular grafts with enhanced mechanical properties. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6179.

15. El-Husseiny, H.M.; Mady, E.A.; Hamabe, L.; Abugomaa, A.; Shimada, K.; Yoshida, T.; Tanaka, T.; Yokoi, A.; Elbadawy, M.; Tanaka, R. Smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels: Cutting-edge platforms for tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. Mater. Today Bio 2022, 13, 100186.

16. Neumann, M.; Di Marco, G.; Iudin, D.; Viola, M.; Van Nostrum, C.F.; Van Ravensteijn, B.G.P.; Vermonden, T. Stimuli-esponsive hydrogels: The dynamic smart biomaterials of tomorrow. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 8377–8392.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

Issue

Section

Articles