Load Capacity with Bioinspired Structural Forms in Lightweight Bridge Components: Lifecycle Assessment

Authors

  • Timothy Hung Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author
  • Ka-Man Tsang Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Bioinspired Structures, Load Capacity, Lifecycle Assessment, Lightweight Bridges, Bioinspired Structural Forms

Abstract

The integration of bioinspired structural forms into civil infrastructure offers a profound opportunity to enhance material efficiency and mechanical performance. This paper investigates the methodology of predicting the load capacity of lightweight bridge components that utilize bioinspired geometries, specifically those mimicking trabecular bone and hierarchical leaf venation. By coupling structural performance prediction with Lifecycle Assessment, this research provides a comprehensive evaluation framework that balances mechanical integrity with environmental sustainability. Through extensive modeling and simulation, morphological traits derived from biological systems were translated into parametric structural components. These components were subsequently evaluated for ultimate load capacity under various stress states using advanced predictive algorithms based entirely on material property descriptors and geometric parameters. Simultaneously, a rigorous Lifecycle Assessment was conducted to quantify the embodied energy, carbon footprint, and resource depletion associated with the manufacturing and deployment of these novel structures. The findings demonstrate that bioinspired components not only meet the rigorous load capacity requirements of lightweight bridge systems but also significantly reduce the lifecycle environmental impacts compared to traditional monolithic designs. This synergy between biomimetic structural engineering and environmental assessment establishes a new paradigm for the development of sustainable, high-performance transport infrastructure.

References

1. El Chawich, G.; El Hayek, J.; Rouessac, V.; Cot, D.; Rebiere, B.; Habchi, R.; Garay, H.; Bechelany, M.; Zakhour, M.; Miele, P.; et al. Design and Manufacturing of Si-Based Non-Oxide Cellular Ceramic Structures through Indirect 3D Printing. Materials 2022, 15, 471.

2. Qin, Y.; Qiao, J.; Chi, S.; Tian, H.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H. 4D Printing Self-Sensing and Load-Carrying Smart Components. Materials 2024, 17, 5903.

3. Rudnik, M. Study of cellular structures built from self-similar models and repeatable structures manufactured by FDM/FFF technology. Polimery 2024, 69, 173–178.

4. Román-Doval, R.; Torres-Arellanes, S.P.; Tenorio-Barajas, A.Y.; Gómez-Sánchez, A.; Valencia-Lazcano, A.A. Chitosan: Properties and its application in agriculture in context of molecular weight. Polymers 2023, 15, 2867.

5. Milutinovic, M.; Movrin, D.; Pjevic, M.; Popovic, M. Additive Manufacturing: A Key to Advancing Injection Molding Efficiency. Teh. Glas. J. 2025, 19, 141–146.

6. Elango, J. Proliferative and osteogenic supportive effect of VEGF-loaded collagen-chitosan hydrogel system in bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1297.

7. Sommer, K.; Sammler, F.; Heiler, R.; Pfennig, A. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and geometric deviations of additively manufactured LPBF-IN718 lattice structures. Prakt. Metallogr. Metallogr. 2025, 62, 863–883.

8. Malekan, M.; Sigurjonsson, B. On the mechanical behavior of polymeric lattice structures fabricated by stereolithography 3D printing. Eng. Rep. 2024, 6, e13003.

9. Laskowska, D.; Balasz, B.; Zawadka, W. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of As-Built Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb Alloys Produced by Selective Laser Melting Technology. Materials 2024, 17, 4604.

10. Polo, S.; Garcia-Dominguez, A.; Rubio, E.M.; Claver, J. Lattice Structures in Additive Manufacturing for Biomedical Applications: A Systematic Review. Polymers 2025, 17, 2285.

11. Frasch, J.; Schwinger, C.; Traxdorf, R.; Graf, S.; Kinast, J. Additive manufacturing of variothermal injection moulding insert made of Al-40Si. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 134, 2067–2080.

12. Malachowska, A.; Drej, W.; Rusak, A.; Koziel, T.; Pikulski, D.; Stopyra, W. Laser Remelting of Biocompatible Ti-Based Glass-Forming Alloys: Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Cytotoxicity. Materials 2025, 18, 5687.

13. Rudnik, M.; Szot, W.; Kowalska, N.; Szczygiel, P. Bending Properties of Standardized Photopolymer-Silicone Hybrid Structures Manufactured via PolyJet Matrix. Materials 2025, 18, 5612.

14. Martins, R.S.; Salar, H.; Salar, M.; Luo, J.; Poulikidis, K.; Razi, S.S.; Latif, M.J.; Tafuri, K.; Bhora, F.Y. Making minimally invasive procedures more sustainable: A systematic review comparing the environmental footprint of single-use versus multi-use instruments. World J. Surg. 2024, 48, 2212–2223.

15. Mohammad, A.; Tuhin, M. A review of applications of collaborative robot in welding and additive manufacturing. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2026, 100, 103256.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

Issue

Section

Articles